"The distinction between 'works of art' and signs that somehow are not artistic strikes me as unconstitutionally vague"
Eugene Volokh on sign regulation in St. Louis.
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Powered by Blogger.
Followers
Link love
Edit here
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(459)
-
▼
September
(36)
- "The distinction between 'works of art' and signs ...
- They Should Be Kicked Out of the AAM Immediately!
- We Demand You Not Close the Museum You Are Not Clo...
- Linkage
- Not So Much
- Inside Job?
- Protect Yourself
- On loopholes
- Rose News
- Can you copyright the West Coast Offense?
- "However, the act does not appear to forbid buildi...
- "Picasso shrugged: 'I often paint fakes'"
- "Is there anyone out there who is involved with th...
- "The Attorney General would like to correct that a...
- More Deaccession Confusion
- Fiskophrenia
- Relax
- They Found the Missing Corot
- Hilarious (UPDATED)
- A couple more notes on Fisk and donor intent
- Maybe someone can make "The Art of the Steal Part 2"
- "The ex-con who allegedly lost a $1 million painti...
- "The state of Tennessee and Metropolitan Nashville...
- "The Collection should return to the Fisk campus w...
- Arrest in Corot Case
- British Artists Protest Possible Cut in Arts Funding
- Linkage
- "If convicted the suspects could face three years ...
- Broke
- Rainy day funds
- "Even if it’s real, who owns that wall, and can I ...
- Was it O'Keeffe's intent that the collection be se...
- Drunken Lawsuit Update
- "That would leave Fisk not only with no art-sale r...
- Linkage
- "The legislation grew out of cases in which time b...
-
▼
September
(36)
Post a Comment